Ce document rend compte d\u2019un atelier tenu le 5 janvier 2009 \u00e0 l\u2019invitation de Citoyennet\u00e9 et Immigration Canada. L\u2019atelier portait sur le r\u00e9alignement des responsabilit\u00e9s f\u00e9d\u00e9rales-provinciales en mati\u00e8re d\u2019\u00e9tablissement survenu dans les ann\u00e9es 1990. Il visait \u00e0 tirer les le\u00e7ons des deux d\u00e9cennies pr\u00e9c\u00e9dentes et \u00e0 proposer comment ces le\u00e7ons pourraient \u00e9clairer les orientations futures.<\/p>","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_members_access_role":[],"_members_access_error":""},"toolkits-reports-category":[119],"class_list":["post-4922","toolkits-reports","type-toolkits-reports","status-publish","hentry","toolkits-reports-category-settlement-and-integration-policies-and-practices"],"acf":{"blocks":[{"acf_fc_layout":"text","text":"
This paper reports on a workshop that took place on January 5, 2009, hosted by Citizenship and Immigration Canada.\u00a0 The workshop focused on the realignment in federal-provincial responsibilities for settlement that took place in the 1990s.\u00a0 The goal of the workshop was to extract lessons from the previous two decades of experience and to suggest how these lessons might inform future directions.\u00a0 At the table were former and currently active federal and provincial officials as well as academics. The workshop operated according to Chatham House rules, meaning that participants cannot not identified and remarks may not be attributed to individuals.<\/p>\n
As a matter of design, the workshop focused on British Columbia and Manitoba, the two provinces \u2013 Quebec aside \u2013 where responsibility for settlement services was fully devolved to the provinces.\u00a0 Separate exercises will be undertaken with regard to provinces and territories where co-management arrangements are in place and where Citizenship and Immigration Canada still retains full responsibility.\u00a0 Notwithstanding this plan, participants employed a broader empirical and experiential base to enrich their interventions.\u00a0 This supported the underlying workshop goal of identifying an \u2018optimal model\u2019 for federal-provincial settlement arrangements with a view to achieving the best possible settlement outcomes for newcomers.<\/p>\n","remove_heading_underline":false},{"acf_fc_layout":"media_feature","type":"pdf","pdf":{"en_file":4923,"en_label":"Settlement Renewal - Lessons from the Past, Directions for the Future","fr_file":null,"fr_label":""},"video":{"title":"","video":null}}]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/p2pcanada.truemarket.io\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/toolkits-reports\/4922","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/p2pcanada.truemarket.io\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/toolkits-reports"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/p2pcanada.truemarket.io\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/toolkits-reports"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/p2pcanada.truemarket.io\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4922"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"toolkits-reports-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/p2pcanada.truemarket.io\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/toolkits-reports-category?post=4922"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}